Comments on: Please send your forged signatures to CA AG and LA DA

By: Brenda

Brenda — Tue, 27 May 2008 12:00:25 +0000

Wow. Good luck!!! Keep us posted.

By: Paul

Paul — Tue, 27 May 2008 05:32:06 +0000

I have hired a PI to help me find their location. he will accompany me when I approach them for a refund.

The listed addresses are bogus. I did talk with a detective in the West Beverly Hills (7336 jurisdiction) Police department (Gary Caplan). He told me the 7336 address is a PO (Mail box Etc.) box. He said the place will cooperate with him and his detectives if we can convince them to look into it. I filed a complaint with the Portland Police (Forgery) and he should have it by now. I am following up with him this week.

I hear the Gardner address is bogus as well.

By: Brenda

Brenda — Tue, 27 May 2008 02:02:13 +0000

I was in LA recently and thought about swinging by to see if it’s even a real address, but then I decided not to ruin my trip. I agree with Mike — how do you plan to get your money back “in person”? A baseball bat? I would say hit them a couple times for all of us, but I also think we’re more likely to see results going through the legal channels. But regardless, in all seriousness, good luck and I REALLY hope you get results.

By: Mike

Mike — Sat, 24 May 2008 18:25:52 +0000

I understand your concerns Paul, but as it stands at the moment, Gisol is using the signatures to prove their case, and people have been sending in their complaints over a long period. To the LA DA and CA AG, it must look like we have simply been moaning about the money.

If we actually send evidence of forgery and fraud, and they get a lot of them in one go, they may start to realise that there is a problem.

BTW How are you going to get the money back?

By: Paul

Paul — Sat, 24 May 2008 18:16:40 +0000

You would hope but this has been going on for a long time.

I am going to Santa Monica to get my money back in person.

By: Mike

Mike — Sat, 24 May 2008 09:13:18 +0000

I’m sure that in individual cases, Gisol’s ‘evidence’ may look convincing.

If they suddenly get a flood of customers from all around the world sending the ’same’ evidence, surely they will see a pattern, and act on it.

By: Paul

Paul — Sat, 24 May 2008 01:55:47 +0000

This will not work. GISOL sent 3 documents (same information they sent Discover, all with identical signatures. AG said it was dismissing the case saying it is a difference of opinion.

LA AG is worthless.